|
||||
|
IS
THERE A PLACE FOR ARTHROSCOPY? Arthroscopy is useful to
repair complete
ligament and
tendon tears and also to shave bone like under
the acromion when a person has an
impingement syndrome in the shoulder when it
doesn’t heal completely with
Prolotherapy. The number of arthroscopies ever
recommended at
Caring
Medical can probably be counted on one's hands. The
number of arthroscopies that have been prevented is in the hundreds. RELATED ARTICLES Professional teams have
orthopedic surgeons as their team physicians. Their healing tools primarily
consist of the
RICE treatment (Rest, Immobilize, Ice, Elevate),
NSAIDS,
cortisone shots,
the arthroscope, and the scalpel. Which one of these actually heals or repairs
the injury? The answer is none of them. What these treatments actually do is
weaken or "damage" the athlete and decrease the chances of healing.
It is a sad fact that after the team physician has gone through the arsenal of
RICE, anti-inflammatories, and cortisone shots, the infamous "scope
recommendation" will soon follow for the non-healing athletic injury. The
problem is that athletes have no idea what is involved with arthroscopy.
Arthroscopy is surgery, the myth that athletes have been fed is that a scope
can find out the problem and solve it. Nothing could be farther from the truth
for the average sports injury. All the arthroscope can do is look at the
tissue. Arthroscopy: The Quickest Route to an Athletic Injury The easiest and most overt
way athletes are injured is not from a cheap shot from an opponent, but by one
of their supposed allies, the arthroscope. This subtle stoic instrument is
slipped into the knees, ankles, and shoulders of athletes while they are
asleep. The subtle intruder has razor-sharp teeth that slice through tissue
easier than the slick blade of a butcher. The arthroscope is capable of
producing more irreversible damage than the most vicious opponent produces.
The damage is, however, often masked by the incredible feeling of vitality
following the procedure. The athlete's euphoria, because someone has finally
fixed the problem is followed by a tenacious rehabilitation course, as the
athlete is eager to get back to the field. The problem is that the scope did
nothing but make the athlete's knee, shoulder, ankle, or whatever joint
weaker. The weakness is masked by the massive amount of exercise that the
athlete does after the procedure. The athlete experiences continued pain, but
the orthopedist insists that more exercise is needed. The athletes often
return to their sports, perhaps with less pain than before the scope, but
report that their joints "just never felt the same" after the
surgery. There is a sense that something is not quite right, but they cannot
put a finger on it. This is a sure sign that weakness is the cause of that
"just not quite right" feeling. The knee is now weaker. The shoulder
is now weaker. The ankle is now weaker. This is why the athlete does not feel
quite right. What is Arthroscopy? The word arthroscopy comes from the prefix arth-, which means joint, and scope, which means scope. Arthroscopy involves inserting a scope into a joint to look at it. The guise under which arthroscopy flourishes is that it is supposed to help with diagnosis of an athlete's problem and allows the orthopedist the ability to fix the problem immediately. It is important to know exactly what is involved in receiving arthroscopy. It is a surgical procedure. The majority of arthroscopic surgeries in the United States are currently performed with either spinal block or general anesthesia. This means that the person is totally anesthetized (knocked out) or paralyzed from the waist down (spinal block). These procedures obviously carry their own risks. The following instruments are normally needed to perform arthroscopic procedures: 1. 4.0-mm diameter arthroscope with a 30-degree viewing lens 2. 4.0-mm diameter arthroscope with a 70-degree viewing lens 3. Video camera 4. Recorder 5. Pump 6. Motorized shavers or bur (a rotary cutting instrument) 7. Probe 8. Assorted hand instruments
(e.g., grasper, clamps, curette). At any one time during
arthroscopy of the knee, four instruments could be stuck into an athlete's
knee-including scopes, probes, shavers, pumps, and various other instruments
of local destruction. The question to ask is how can so many instruments be
stuck into such a small space? This is a great question. The knee joint
normally contains only a small amount of fluid, approximately five
millimeters. During a scope, one of the ports (place for a probe) is for the
pump. This device pumps saline water into the knee. Depending on the knee, up
to 120 milliliters of fluid may be pumped into the knee under force. The
question to ask is would not ballooning up the knee to this degree cause the
ligaments, meniscus, cartilage, and joints to become stretched, inflamed, and
injured? Could it be possible that this forceful pumping of fluid
in-and-of-itself might cause the tears, rough edges, and
inflammation that are
so often reported on arthroscopy reports? What about the presence of all of
these probes, shavers, and other instruments in such a small area? Another interesting question
is, perhaps, what are the benefits of arthroscopy? What is meant by this
question is, does arthroscopy produce immediate pain relief, often experienced
after the surgery, or are these results from the joint being flushed? Early Arthroscopic
Complications It should be noted that
specific kinds of arthroscopic procedures have their own kinds of
complications. For instance, in ACL reconstruction (ligament reconstruction of
the knee) all of the following types of complications have been reported:
hemarthrosis, hematoma (blood clot), sepsis, skin necrosis,
arthrofibrosis
(excessive scar tissue), deep venous thrombosis (vein blood clot), recurrent
effusion (fluid keeps filling in the knee), sensory nerve injury, reflex
sympathetic dystrophy (formation of severe chronic
knee pain), tourniquet
paralysis, tissue irritation over a metallic device, and compartmental
syndrome. The most common complication
in ACL reconstruction, however, is arthrofibrosis, resulting in loss of
flexion, extension, or both. This means that, after the arthroscopy, the
person cannot move the knee normally. It is fibrosed, or scarred down, so
normal movement is not possible. The incidence of this has been shown to be as
high as 3.7 percent. ACL reconstruction complications also occur due to use of
the synthetic or natural grafts. Some people react to both the synthetic and
natural grafts and reject them. Shoulder arthroscopy is also
fraught with complications. Complications have included nerve injury,
Rotator
Cuff
tear, as well as the usual hemarthrosis and infections. One of the most common arthroscopic procedures is partial meniscectomy, which has a high rate for development of long-term arthritis because of the high pressures generated on the tibial cartilage when the meniscus is removed. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is not much better, with a high percentage of athletes not returning to their presurgerical level of athletics, even after a year of rehabilitation. Shoulder arthroscopic surgery is also not very effective at getting the athlete back to playing their sport either, especially if the shoulder joint has some instability. The reason for all of these suboptimal outcomes is because arthroscopy does not heal anything. Arthroscopy typically involves looking into the joint and shaving or removing tissue. This has nothing to do with repairing the damaged area. Even putting in artificial ligaments and tendon grafts, though helpful for some, is not truly repairing the area. Only Prolotherapy, by stimulating the actual proliferation (growth) of normal collagen tissue, will start the normal repair process of the injured ligaments and tendons. It is for this reason that many athletes are saying the verdict is in--say nope to scope and yes to Prolotherapy. |
|
Caring Medical
and Rehabilitation Services |
|||||||||
Ross
Hauser, M.D.Dr. Hauser received his M.D. from the University of Illinois, Chicago; completed his residency at Loyola-Hines VA-Marianjoy Hospitals in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; and received his Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Hauser is the Medical Director and co-founder of the physician-run, comprehensive natural medicine clinic, Caring Medical & Rehabilitation Services in Oak Park, Illinois. Dr. Hauser is one of the leading experts in the treatment of chronic pain and sports injuries with Prolotherapy. He, along with his wife Marion, have written seven books on the topic of Prolotherapy, a comprehensive book on the natural medicine approach to cancer, as well as a myriad of articles and newsletters for the general public. Read more |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
The information on this website is presented as
information only and not a self-help guide NOR AS SPECIFIC HEALTH
RECOMMENDATIONS. Never alter or change your health management or begin
any new health plans without first consulting your personal health care
provider. Some statements on this site regarding the value of
nutritional supplements have not been evaluated by the FDA.
Caring Medical and Rehabilitation Services 715 Lake Street Suite 600 Oak
Park IL, 60301 |